Canadian Law Courts Case Study.

Name of case and docket Buksa, Ray vs. sunlight Toyota Padamsey, break away Etal Date of trial February 13, 2003 Courtroom number #264 Name of birth D.G. Ingram Names and occupations of all witnesses No witnesses at trial What did the complainant sue for? $3000.00 Assessment for damages What was the defendants defense? The locomotive installed in Mr. Buksas Toyota was properly installed and at not fault of cheerfulness Toyota did the locomotive engine neglectdown. Did the defendant make a claim against the plaintiff? If so, what for? No counterclaim was made by the defendant. Summarize the facts and the evidence of the plaintiff, the defendant and other witnesses The plaintiff Mr Buksa had an engine installed at Sun Toyota, the engine was a rebuilt engine. The rebuilt engine broke down after 3 months and was only on a lower floor imprimatur by Sun Toyota for 30 days. Mr. Buksa learned that the engine was not installed properly and hence that was the cause of the e ngine break down. Sun Toyota would not comply with Mr. Buksas plea of installing or muddle the engine without charge. This continued for over 10 months. Did the parties flummox lawyers? If so what did they do? The defendant Sun Toyota had a lawyer guard them in this matter.

The lawyer took the case on the gradient of Sun Toyota and basically was Suns voice at the trial. Describe the role of the assay. Did s/he get involved or remain outside? Give examples. The judge heard the evidence from both parties. The judge took control and made sure both parties understood the internal representation fully. The ju dge also found a solution to the dockage h! e was presented with. In the case, the defendants lawyer was ill informed and consequently another court date was finally agreed to. What was the role... If you pauperisation to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay